NO.1 -- Exhibit -user@router# show class-of-service
classifiers {
inet-precedence ipp-test {
import default;
forwarding-class best-effort {
loss-priority low code-points be;
forwarding-class expedited-forwarding {
loss-priority low code-points af21;
forwarding-class assured-forwarding {
loss-priority low code-points af11;
forwarding-class network-control {
loss-priority low code-points nc1;
interfaces {
ge-* {
scheduler-map map-test;
unit * {
classifiers {
inet-precedence ipp-test;
rewrite-rules {
inet-precedence ipp-rw-test;
inet-precedence default;
rewrite-rules {
inet-precedence ipp-rw-test {
forwarding-class best-effort {
loss-priority low code-point be;
loss-priority high code-point af21;
forwarding-class expedited-forwarding {
loss-priority high code-point af21;
loss-priority low code-point be;
forwarding-class assured-forwarding {
loss-priority low code-point af11;
loss-priority high code-point af11;
forwarding-class network-control {
loss-priority low code-point nc1;
loss-priority high code-point nc1;
user@router> show class-of-service ... Code point type: inet-precedence Alias Bit pattern af11 001
af21 010 af31 011 af41 100 be 000 cs6 110 cs7 111 ef 101 nc1 110 nc2 111 -- Exhibit -
Click the Exhibit button.
Traffic with the IP precedence value af21 ingresses the router and should be rewritten with the same
value as it egresses; however, this traffic is rewritten to a different value.
Referring to the exhibit, what is the source of this problem?
A. The BA classifier is assigning the traffic to the expedited forwarding queue with a low loss priority.
B. The BA classifier is assigning the traffic to the best-effort queue with a low loss priority.
C. The BA classifier is assigning the traffic to the expedited forwarding queue with a high loss priority.
D. The BA classifier is assigning the traffic to the best-effort queue with a high loss priority.
Answer: A


NO.2 -- Exhibit -user@router> show ospf database
Area Type ID Adv Rtr Seq Age Opt Cksum Len Router 0x800000d4
182 0x22 0x59f3 36 Router 0x800000d4 177 0x22 0x57f2 36 Router
* 0x800000dc 176 0x22 0x75fa 72 Network
0x80000007 177 0x22 0x7957 36 Summary 0x80000004 2370 0x22 0x3f62
28 Summary 0x80000002 471 0x22 0xdeb9 28 Summary 0x800000cb 2037 0x22 0x2bbb 28 Summary 0x800000cc
487 0x22 0x19ca 28 Summary 0x80000003 140 0x22 0xb2f9 28 OSPF AS
SCOPE link state database Type ID Adv Rtr Seq Age Opt Cksum Len Extern *
0x80000002 1037 0x22 0x4225 36 Extern * 0x80000001 2643 0x22 0xfc88 36
user@router> show ospf neighbor Address Interface State ID Pri Dead ge-0/0/1.0 Full 128 36 ge-0/0/1.0 Full 128 30
user@router> show ospf interface ge-0/0/1.0 extensive Interface State Area DR ID BDR ID Nbrs ge-
0/0/1.0 PtToPt 2 Type: P2MP, Address:, Mask:,
MTU: 1500, Cost: 1 Adj count: 2 Hello: 10, DeaD. 40, ReXmit: 5, Not Stub Auth type: None Protection
type: None Topology default (ID 0) -> Cost: 1
user@router> show route protocol ospf table inet.0
inet.0: 11133 destinations, 11135 routes (11133 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both *[OSPF/10] 1w0d 00:01:14, metric 1 MultiRecv -- Exhibit -
Click the Exhibit button.
Referring to the exhibit, why are the OSPF routes missing from the routing table for this router?
A. mismatching OSPF interface type with the neighbor
B. no Type 4 LSAs in the OSPF database
C. incorrect IP address configured on the interface
D. MTU mismatch with the neighbor
Answer: A


NO.3 An end user on interface ge-0/0/1.0 is trying to receive a multicast stream for sourced
from but is not receiving it. You use the show igmp group command and do not see this group in the
list. You enable traceoptions for IGMP and find the following IGMPv3 report from the end user's host:
Jun 10 13:11:03.577641 RCV IGMP V3 Report len 16 from intf ge-0/0/1.0
Jun 10 13:11:03.577984 Records 1
Jun 10 13:11:03.578027 Group, type IS_EX, aux_len 0, sources 0
Which configuration change is required to allow the group to be added in the router?
A. set routing-options multicast ssm-groups
B. set routing-options multicast asm-override-ssm
C. set protocols igmp interface ge-0/0/1.0 group-limit 2
D. set protocols igmp interface ge-0/0/1.0 promiscuous-mode
Answer: B

JN0-694テスト資料   JN0-694知識   

NO.4 -- Exhibit --
user@switch# show vlans
ws {
vlan-id 23;
interface {
} dot1q-tunneling; no-mac-learning; } -- Exhibit -
Click the Exhibit button.
Referring to the exhibit, an administrator notices that all traffic is flooded out of all the ports in VLAN
What would cause this problem?
A. Spanning tree is disabled.
B. Unicast destinations are flooded out of all ports.
C. no-mac-learning is enabled on the interface.
D. dot1q-tunneling is enabled on the VLAN.
Answer: C



JapanCertが提供したJuniperのJN0-694入門知識はあなたが自分の夢を実現することを助けられます。 JapanCertはすべてのJuniperのJN0-694入門知識に受かるための資料に含まれていますから。JapanCertを手にすると、あなたは安心に試験の準備に身を投げられるようになります。JapanCertは高品質なトレーニング資料を提供して、あなたが試験に合格することを保証します。明るい未来を準備してあげます。

JN0-694試験番号:JN0-694 日本語版問題集
試験科目:「Enterprise Routing and Switching Support, Professional (JNCSP-ENT)」

>> JN0-694 日本語版問題集



JapanCertは最新の200-310問題集と高品質の100-105問題と回答を提供します。JapanCertのC_THR91_1505 VCEテストエンジンとC-TPLM22-64試験ガイドはあなたが一回で試験に合格するのを助けることができます。高品質のC-THR82-1605 PDFトレーニング教材は、あなたがより迅速かつ簡単に試験に合格することを100%保証します。試験に合格して認証資格を取るのはそのような簡単なことです。